Sun Life Direct

Category » News

Double Standards of Cabinet Ministers as they increase their pension incomes

Posted on Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012 in News

Minister of the Cabinet, Francis Maude—who is already unpopular for suggesting that people go out and buy extra petrol to fill up Jerry cans, which has resulted in panic buying—has pushed through changes that increase Cabinet ministers’ pension incomes.

The reforms, which came into force on Monday, will see cabinet ministers contribute an extra 2.4% towards their gold-plated final-salary pension funds.  However, this small increase in contributions will change the way their pensions are calculated.

Cabinet ministers will now be required to contribute £229 each year more than other MPs, but this extra contribution will ensure that they receive an extra £314 each year from their pension income.

The increase will add up to an extra £6,280 over a twenty year period. Tory MP for Rochester and Strood, Mark Reckless, said: ‘For the country as a whole, the Prime Minister and Chancellor are keen for those with the broadest shoulders to make bigger sacrifices so as to lighten the load for those who are paid less. However, there is a different approach nearer home.’

MPs earn a basic salary of £65,738 per year and cabinet ministers get paid an extra £68,827 on top for their extra duties.   They also receive bigger pension pots due to how their pensions are calculated: their ministerial contributions are divided by their MP contributions.

Ministers in the coalition cabinet can look forward to a nest egg of £731,000, which could be worth up to £43,000 a year in pension payouts.

Robert Oxley, from the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: ‘It’s hypocritical for ministers to preach about the need to make pensions more sustainable while improving their own already extremely generous retirement deals.

‘Politicians must to show leadership in the face of the overwhelming need to reform public sector pensions, ensuring they are fair and affordable to taxpayers.

‘If Cabinet ministers are instead sneaking through bonuses for their own retirement then they will lose all moral authority to make the difficult decisions currently required of them.’

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Apr 03, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

OECD: Britain has returned to recession

Posted on Friday, March 30th, 2012 in News

Research from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development think-tank has been published today, and their report says Britain has slipped back into an official recession.

Some economists say that a contraction of the economy has been inevitable given higher unemployment, higher government spending and higher taxation. The chief economist for OECD, Pier Carlo Padoan, said: “The [eurozone] has only managed to get a bit further away from the edge of the cliff”.

However, the ‘double dip’ recession was denied by the chancellor, George Osbourne, who said Britain was enjoying encouraging economic signs. He denied a return to negative growth.

The Treasury said OECD’s findings were flawed, and Investec also doubted OECD’s findings as Mr Osbourne said the government was working hard to make improvements. But shadow chancellor Ed Balls took the opportunity to point out where he believed the coalition were failing: “A double-dip recession can and should be avoided. But after 15 months of zero growth under George Osborne, simply avoiding a technical recession is not good news for our economy.”

OECD, who are based in Paris, say that the British economy shrank by 0.3% at the end of last year, and has shrunk a further 0.1% in the first quarter of 2011. GDP has fallen around 0.1% in the first quarter. Although there is continued disagreement about the economy, experts generally agree that the outlook is better in the second half of 2012, but predictions of growth are still conservative, and many in Europe feel that harsh cutbacks, poor lending from banks
and rising inflation will do little to improve the situation.

Their report goes on to predict that growth may return as summer approaches, a concern previously voiced by the Bank of England. Analysts warn that the planned Diamond Jubilee in June could spell problems for the economy as the country will enjoy two bank holiday days in a row. This is a relatively rare occurrence, but Britain also received an extra bank holiday
to celebrate the Royal Wedding last year. In the meantime, the OECD say there is “scope” for more quantitative easing, diminishing the value of sterling in the process.

The OECD report warned that the USA is likely to experience a much faster bounce back this year than the eurozone, with Italy finding it hardest to emerge from ongoing financial troubles as the two continents drifted further apart economically.

Italy is already in recession, and the economic situation there is expected to get worse. The US economy is expected to grow by 2.9% in the present quarter and 2.8% next quarter as consumer confidence also begins to pick up. The outlook for Europe is, according to OECD paperwork, “very weak”, and high oil prices are expected to contribute to the difficulties, say the company.

The organisation also report a slowing in growth for emerging economies such as China.

Germany has also shown warning signs, but unemployment rates recently fell to a record low.

This is filed under: News
Added on Mar 30, 2012 by admin | Comments 0

Number of working pensioners doubles in past decade

Posted on Thursday, March 29th, 2012 in News, Over 55s

The number of older people in the UK who are still working past their retirement age has increased dramatically over the past decade.

An article published this week in the Spectator Magazine has shown that many over-65s have stayed in employment and many have taken on roles that younger people have spurned.

Whilst the budget saw the introduction the of the ‘granny tax’ due to ministers thinking that pensioners should help lessen the burden of taxpayers, figures produced by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that although there are 789,000 fewer people in the UK working under the age of 65, there are actually 358,000 more pensioners working than in 2001.

The report states: ‘The only way that the economy expanded during the Labour years was through more debt, foreign-born workers and pensioners returning to (or staying in) work,’

‘The changing nature of the British workforce has not just meant Polish plumbers, but also British pensioners, behind the tills at Tesco.

‘Indeed, many employers prefer to hire pensioners, because they can be relied upon to turn up on time and don’t turn their nose up at work. In many cases, the value of their pension has been shot to pieces – so they need to keep earning.

‘For whatever reason, the proportion of pensioners in Britain’s workforce has doubled.

‘Even including immigrants, pensioners account for half of the rise in employment since the election.’

The analysis revealed that the number of people employed who were between 16 and 64 years old and born in the UK, reduced from 25,093,000 in 2001 to 24,304,000 in 2011.

However, the number of people employed who were over 65 years old and born in the UK rose from 418,000 to 776,000 in the same time period.

This figure is predicted to double again in the coming years as more and more people over the age of 65 continue to work, with many older people in their last 60s and even their 70s, feeling that they cannot afford to retire in the current financial climate.

In addition to this, in the past, employers could force a member of staff to retire at 65, but now the default retirement age has been scrapped people can continue working for as long as they wish, unless they prove to be incompetent at their job.

 

 

This is filed under: News, Over 55s
Added on Mar 29, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Earning Threshold on Automatic Enrolment Scheme Increases

Posted on Tuesday, March 27th, 2012 in News

The Government have confirmed it has increased the threshold for the automatic enrolment pension plan to include more higher earners.

Workers earning from £5,564 and going up to £42,475, will now be able to receive minimum contributions on the automatic enrolment scheme.  

The Government hope that by raising the pay threshold that between four and eight million more people will become eligible for the new scheme, or alternative pension schemes such as Nest.

The automatic enrolment scheme will begin in October this year and is expected to take six years to be fully phased in.

The idea for the automatic enrolment scheme came about following a commission by Lord Turner in 2008, in a bid to increase the level of pension savings for employees in the UK— particularly in the private sector.

When it was first announced, the threshold of earnings for those eligible was between £5,035 and £33,500.

This has now been amended after consultations led to the Government deciding to extend the scheme to those earning higher wages.

Along with the upper limit of earnings increasing, staff and employers are only obliged to make contributions once a person’s earnings exceed £8,105 — a move from a previous wages point of £7,475.

An annual limit for the contributions of the worker and employer combined has been set at £4,400.

A senior consultant at Tower Watson, a pension consultancy firm, Rudi Smith, said:

“Under the original legislation, all of the automatic enrolment thresholds would have increased with national average earnings each year.

“The government changed the law so it could adjust these numbers however it sees fit.” He continued.

“It is keeping its cards close to its chest when it comes to how this power will be used in future.”

Whilst the automatic enrolment pension scheme commences this autumn, only the very largest of companies will be enrolling their employees at this stage.

Companies will have to ensure that all eligible workers are offered the option to join their current company pension—so long as the scheme meets the required minimum standards—or have them join the National Employer Savings Trust (NEST) instead.

The Government wants the automatic enrolment scheme to be completed by the middle of 2017.

Once all employers have the scheme in place, staff and bosses will be obliged to make the minimum level of contribution of 8% of earnings combined. This phase is expected to be complete by October 2018.

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Mar 27, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Chancellor confirms flat-rate pension in Budget

Posted on Thursday, March 22nd, 2012 in News, Over 55s

A flat rate pension of £140 a week will be introduced in 2016 for those with a 30 year national insurance record.

The Chancellor, George Osborne,  said that the change, which replaces the basic state pension and the second state pension (S2P) previously known as Serps, will not cost the country any more than the existing system does.   

This is good news for people on low incomes who have made little or no contributions to S2P as they will now be entitled to a higher pension, however people who pay higher rates of tax will lose up to £40 a week.

Only those retiring after the new scheme has been introduced will get the new flat rate, nothing will change for pensioners who are already receiving state pensions.

The move is not without its critics; General Secretary of the National Pensioners Convention, Dot Gibson said: “The proposal to merge the basic and second state pensions into a single £140 a week payment is a classic case of smoke and mirrors – given that someone could retire today and get a combined basic and second state pension of £150 a week.

“In reality there will be no extra money to raise Britain’s scandalously low state pension – just a different way of packaging the payment. Not only that but it will also create a two-tier pension system with existing pensioners still having to struggle with a complicated means-tested system that leaves one in four older people in poverty.”

It was also announced in the budget that automatic reviews of the state pension age (SPA) would happen to deal with the increase in longevity, with details of how this will be introduced to be published with the OBR’s fiscal sustainability report.

The coalition had already announced that the age people can draw their state pension would be put up to 66 by 2020 and then to 67 by the year 2028.  With many financial experts predicting that this could rise to 73 by 2050.

Whilst many expected the chancellor to cut tax relief on pensions contributions for higher rate tax payers, this didn’t happen and has angered many over-55 groups.

 

This is filed under: News, Over 55s
Added on Mar 22, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

20-somethings worse off than their parents

Posted on Wednesday, March 21st, 2012 in News

Research conducted by the Financial Times has shown that for the first time in half a century, many young people in the UK will be worse off than their parents.

Older generations traditional enjoy much higher standards of living than their parents, but for the past decade the disposable incomes of those in their 20s has stayed relatively the same.

Whilst salaries have risen, younger people have had to contend with increases in national insurance, university tuition fees and more recently, cuts to working tax credits and child benefit payments.

People who are in their 60s enjoyed free university education, cheaper housing, gold-plated pensions and currently have perks such as free TV licences, bus passes and the winter fuel allowance.

The study looked at information available from the UK Data Archive, and with figures collated from more than 73,000 households from 1961 to 2010, it shows that the trend of increased living standards ends for those born between 1985 and 1995.

The pivotal year seems to be 2000, which was before the economic crisis, when the household income of those in their 20s was first overtaken by those in their 60s.

The standard of living for people in their 20s falls even further when compared to those in their 70s and 80s, due mainly to the cost of housing.

With the budget due this week, it is expected that Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, will protect the over-60s from austerity measure, meaning that the gulf of living standards could widen.

Labour’s former Chancellor Alistair Darling told the FT: ‘You can’t honestly say to younger people any longer, you’ll do better than your father or mother’s generation.

‘This trend has been developing over a number of years and politics as a whole has been lagging behind.’

Money experts predict that the widening wealth gap will lead to more and more younger people reaching out to their parents to help them financially.

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Mar 21, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Three Quarters of Nurses too busy to talk to elderly patients

Posted on Tuesday, March 20th, 2012 in News

A study published by the Royal College of Nursing shows that three quarters of nurses feel they don’t have enough time in their working day to speak to elderly hospital patients, and many are so pushed for time they are unable to help them eat.

The report also goes on to say that the over-65s are more likely to find themselves looked after healthcare assistants (HCAs), rather than nurses due to a lack of qualified professionals.   

A registered nurse is expected to look after an average of nine older patients; often these patients are frail, very poorly and have complicated medical requirements.

The RCN is asking that the situation be addressed by increasing the number of registered nurses looking after elderly patients to two-thirds of staff, and to ensure that they are not required to look after more than seven people.

Currently there is an average of a 50:50 split between registered nurses and HCAs on wards for older patients; which the RCN feel that this, combined with staff shortages, is putting patients at risk.

The report states: ‘On older people’s wards that have fewer registered nurses than others, more episodes of missed or compromised care are reported.

‘Often there is simply not enough time and skill to satisfactorily deliver activities such as comforting and talking with patients.’

The study was conducted based on a survey of 1,700 nurses, with 240 of those working on elderly patient wards within the NHS.  More than 3 out of 4 nurses questioned said they were unable to spend time talking to and comforting patients.

One in three were too busy to aid patients when it came to mealtimes, and the same number also struggled to find time to help patients go to the bathroom.  One in six felt they were too rushed to adequately care for patients who were dying.

According to the RCN, nurses said that they didn’t have enough time to properly supervise HCAs.

Chief Executive of the RCN, Dr Peter Carter said: ‘Patients on older people’s wards are being let down by systemic failings in our hospitals. It is unacceptable that there are not enough nurses on older people’s wards.’

The study shows that fewer nurses were working on wards for elderly people, with an average of one nurse for 9 patients on elderly wards compared to 6.7 on general wards and 4.2 on children’s wards.

The RCN recommended that for the safe care of patients, elderly wards needed one nurse for 7 patients and that the ration of nurses to HCA be increased to 65:35.

Deputy Director of the NHS Confederation, Jo Webber countered: ‘We know that in too many cases, older people on NHS wards have been let down by poor care. The answer, however, lies in tackling a complex range of issues in areas like culture, values and styles of leadership.’

This is filed under: News
Added on Mar 20, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Homeowners in their 50s with interest-only mortgages face ‘ticking timebomb’

Posted on Thursday, March 15th, 2012 in News, Over 55s

The financial regulator warned that many interest-only mortgage holders in their 50s could be sitting on a ‘ticking timebomb’.

Martin Wheatley, a director of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), told MPs he was concerned about the number of interest-only mortgages that were coming to the end of their term and holders had no means to pay off the balance.

When Mr Wheatley addressed the Treasury select committee, he said: ‘There is a ticking timebomb that has been created over the last 20 years.’

There are currently over 11 million mortgages in Britain and 40% of them are interest-only, meaning that the homeowner pays off the interest each month, but the actual total of the loan remains the same.

The FSA has estimated that between now and 2020, approximately 1.5 million of these mortgages – worth around £120 billion – ‘will be due for repayment’.  And 150,000 interest-only mortgages will end each year for the next 10 years.

Worryingly, the FSA report that approximately 80% of people who had taken out this type of mortgage have ‘no repayment strategy’ and that though many people had been saving, their investments have performed badly and the low interest rate has left them short.

New proposals by the FSA, called the Mortgage Market Review is aiming to clamp down on interest-only mortgages.

When the new rules come into action, possibly in 2013, homeowners will not be allowed to take out interest-only mortgages if they can’t prove they are saving towards paying off the final amount.

New age restrictions will also be bought in, ensuring that a loan must end before a person turns 75.  This will mean that homeowners in their mid to late 50s would not be able to take on another 25 year mortgage.

However, the new rules will not help those who have taken out interest-only mortgages in the past, and the new proposals will leave a lot of people in their 50s finding it difficult to remortgage their homes.

A spokesperson for the Council of Mortgage Lenders said: ‘Lenders are attuned to this issue and will treat borrowers sympathetically.’

 

This is filed under: News, Over 55s
Added on Mar 15, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Tesco raises its pension age to 67

Posted on Wednesday, March 14th, 2012 in News, Retirement

Supermarket giants Tesco announced yesterday that it is moving the pension age for its staff from 65 to 67.  In addition to making its workforce work an extra two years before they can draw their pensions, it is also changing the inflation rate that its pensions are linked to from the lucrative retail prices index (RPI) to the more cost effective consumer prices index (CPI).  Any increases in inflation rate will be capped at 5%.

These two initiatives will cost an employee on £26,000 per year 20% of their pension pot which works out at £88,000.

The changes have been introduced after a review of the company’s career-average pension scheme.  (more…)

This is filed under: News, Retirement
Added on Mar 14, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

State Pensions could become exempt from Income Tax

Posted on Thursday, March 8th, 2012 in News

Many pensioners could find themselves £1,000 better off each year if plans go ahead to have them exempt from paying income tax on their state pension payments.

A recent report published by the Office for Tax Simplification proposed this move because many retirees thought it was unfair.  The report also stated that the current tax rules for pensioners were confusing.   

HM Revenue and Customs estimate that nearly 5.6 million pensioners who receive the basic state pension pay income tax.  Most of them do so because they also have a private pension and/or a savings account, where the payments and interest paid takes them over the tax threshold.

Currently more than 1.5 million retirees in the UK have to submit a self-assessment form each year.

The report compiled for Treasury ministers, said there was a ‘patchwork of allowances and rules which many in their later years find very confusing’, and making pensioners pay tax on their state pension only added to this confusion.

According to official figures, less than half of all pensioners realised that their state pension income could be taxed.  The report says: ‘Many of those who do understand that it is taxable feel that this is unjust, given that they have contributed through the national insurance system through their working life.’

The report suggests the option of making the state pension exempt from income tax.

Currently, the full basic state pension has a value of £5,311, so not paying the 20% income tax would leave retirees with an extra £1,060 each year.

However, the independent body of advisors, headed by Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, said it had yet to make a final decision on the matter and that it would study the full effect of income tax exemption.  The body will produce a second report later in the year with its recommendations.

Another option on the table is to make state pension payments via the PAYE system, which would mean pension income was taxed at source, making the system less confusing and reducing the amount of people who needed to complete self-assessment forms.

The report says: ‘For some, the arrival of a combination of their state pension and a limited income from their savings and investment can mean for the first time that they need to complete a self-assessment tax return, just when they thought that life was getting easier.’

It also highlighted the fact that both HMRC and the Department for Work and Pensions should be doing more to explain to retired people how pension tax works.

A spokesperson for the Treasury said that a response to the report would be made in the Budget later on in the month, but any formal recommendations on the issue would be unlikely until later on in the year.

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Mar 08, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

AnnuitySupermarket.com is an independent marketing website owned by Annuity Supermarket Limited. Registered Office: 5 Jupiter House, Calleva Park, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 8NN. Registered in England and Wales No: 06513009. Telephone: 0207 183 0360.

Annuity Supermarket Limited cannot and do not offer financial advice. All information you supply to this site will be passed to independent financial advisers who will contact you. Annuity Supermarket Limited is not responsible or liable for any financial service provided by, or obtained through a third party. Our service is free to you but to operate this service we may receive commissions from the independent financial adviser we refer you to. Terms