Sun Life Direct

Category » News

Energy Firms Offer Cash Incentives to Increase Insulation Installments

Posted on Tuesday, February 21st, 2012 in News

Some of the big energy suppliers are so far behind the Government insulation targets that they have taken to paying to get name of those who are in need of insulation.

British Gas will pay £50 to anyone who can supply the name of person qualifying to have their house insulated – such as an elderly person or a family on benefits.   

The company has launched this initiative to get free insulation installed in 500,000 “needy” homes by 2013.

Energy companies have found it difficult to persuade household to come forward to have insulation installed.

British Gas is hoping that the potential of earning hundreds of pounds will spur people on to nominate vulnerable family members, neighbours and friends to receive free cavity wall or loft insulation.

Loft insulation can save households up to £175 a year on their heating bills, and cavity wall insulation can save up to £135 a year.

Several of the ‘Big 6’ energy firms offer free insulation to customers, but now they have also started offering cash incentives in order to achieve the targets set down by the Government.

Scottish & Southern Energy offers a £25 shopping voucher as an incentive to get insulations and E.On pays £100 to those who take up the initiative.

However, British Gas have raised the stakes further by promising £50 to the householder who has the insulation as well as £50 to the person who nominates them.

The offers are restricted to a priority group of low-income families, to qualify for the British Gas offer they must be on Pension Credit, receiving Child Tax Credit (with an income below £16,190), or on some credit income-related benefits – usually with a child or a disability.

For many pensioners the insulation will be a life-saver, with many elderly people not turning on their heating for fear of running up high energy bills.

It is estimated that 26% of heat is lost through the roof and a further 33% lost through the walls.

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Feb 21, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Over-50s less likely to get back in employment once made redundant

Posted on Thursday, February 16th, 2012 in News, Over 55s

Nearly 50% of unemployed people aged 50 or more have been out of work for at least a year.  With experts predicting that the majority of older jobseekers will be unlikely to find work again.   

There was an increase of 60,000 in the amount of new positions created between October and December, but statistics released yesterday show that the crisis with unemployment in Britain is getting worse.  Younger people and women have been the worst hit when it comes to losing their jobs, and a record number of people are now working part-time because they cannot get full-time employment.

The number of people working part-time instead of full-time increased to 1.35 million from 83,000 in the last quarter of 2011, the highest number since records began in 1992.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that unemployment figures increased for the 8th month in a row to 2.67 million, or 8.4% of the population.  Between October and December, 524 people lost their jobs every day.

While the unemployment level was less than experts had anticipated, economists still predicted that the number of unemployment would reach 3 million before the end of the year.

One of the growing concerns was the number of over-50s who had struggled to get back into the job market after being laid off.  Out of the 426,000 over-50s unemployed, 189,000 have been jobless for at least a year and 111,000 have been out of work for more than two years. The overall number of people long-term unemployed in other age categories had decreased in the same time period.

Age UK’s Michelle Mitchell has called upon the Government for help to assist the over-50s back into the workplace, stressing that employers were missing out on the wide range of skills and job experience that older people bring with them,

“This disturbing jump in the number of long-term unemployed older workers is a clear signal that the Government needs to take more action to help this age group, particularly at a time when it has raised the state pension age,” she said.

Other sobering statistics revealed that women’s unemployment rose to a 23-year high of 1.12 million and the number of young people without work swelled to 1.04 million.  The number of people claiming unemployment benefits increased more than had been predicted, and fewer people reaching pension age had retired because they couldn’t afford to leave their jobs.

 

This is filed under: News, Over 55s
Added on Feb 16, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Actress Dame Judi Dench Slams Treatment of Elderly

Posted on Tuesday, February 14th, 2012 in Care Fees, News

The Oscar winning actress has spoken out about the mistreatment of the country’s elderly, stating that she thought it was a “distressing scandal”.    

The 77 year old Bond actress has said that modern day care homes were like “warehouses” where elderly people were parked up and medicated to make them more compliant.

Her attack on care homes comes after the collapse last year of Southern Cross, the biggest care home provider in the UK, and the Government dragging its heels in reforming the finance for residential care.

Dame Judi was interviewed by the Radio Times and told the publication that older people should be nurtured and cherished in return for the lifetime contribution they had made to society.

The star said: “The way the elderly are treated, and in some cases warehoused and medicated, rather than nurtured and listened to, is distressing.

“The fact that they pay taxes all of their lives and then are expected to give all of their savings to maintain themselves should they need assistance is absolutely disgraceful and one of the great scandals of our society.”

She added: “We’re not good at dealing with old age in this country. We shove people in a room and leave them sitting round a television.”

At the present time, elderly people in UK who have assets worth more than £23,250 have to pay for the cost of care themselves.  A report commission by Andrew Dilnot in 2011, suggested that a cap of these costs be bought in at £35,000.  No decision has been made by the Government regarding caps on care fees as yet.

Dame Judi revealed that both her husband’s parents and her own mother lived with the family until their deaths.  She said the situation was an “ideal arrangement” for all.

 

picture credit

This is filed under: Care Fees, News
Added on Feb 14, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Workers who leave a firm are penalised on pension pots

Posted on Thursday, February 9th, 2012 in News

Employees who leave a firm and discontinue their pension contributions are being charged a higher rate than current savers.

When a person changes their employers, they can often leave their cash in the pension scheme they were in.  For most people this causes no problems as the money continues to grow without them making any further additions until they wish to consolidate into a new scheme or retire.   

However, it has come to light than a number of pension firms are actually charging a higher rate for these people, to continue to look after their pension pots.

Household names such as Standard Life, Aegon and Scottish Widows are amongst many of the companies who argue that it is fairer to have an ‘active member discount’ for people who make regular contributions, charging those who have left up to twice as much.

The charges, which often double from 0.75% to 1.5%, can shave off thousands of pounds from their final pension fund.

According to the financial advisors AWD Chase de Vere, if a worker left a company after building up a pension fund of £10,000, it would rise in value (at an estimated annual growth of 5%) to £23,660 over 20 years if the charges were 0.6% each year.

But, if the annual charge was raised to 1.5%, the final pension pot would be £19,898 instead, a loss of £3762.

In 2011, Steve Webb the Pensions Minister amended legislation so that pension charges to those who no longer pay into a company pension scheme could be capped.

In recent evidence presented to the Department of Work and Pensions Select Committee, Mr Webb insisted that it was down to the companies to ‘get their act together’ and that Government would only intervene if they failed to do so.

This statement leaves millions of pension savers who had hoped for a quick resolution continuing to pay the higher fees.

Head of Pensions at Hargreaves Lansdown, Tom McPhail, said: ‘Part of the problem is the spectacular failure of communication by the pension companies when telling leavers what’s actually happening.

‘We have seen a recent letter to a customer from one insurer where it was almost impossible to work out that, in fact, it was doubling their annual charges to 1.5 per cent.’

The Pensions Regulator watchdog is aware of the situation and is also investigating these higher charges.

 

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Feb 09, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Decreased mortality rate could harm funding of pension schemes

Posted on Tuesday, February 7th, 2012 in News

Pension experts have warned that the improved mortality rate recorded in 2011 could have a detrimental effect on pensions.

Official figures had the number of deaths recorded in 2011 at 484,000, a reduction of 4% on the previous year. Almost double the average annual drop of 2.4% seen in the previous decade.

The Actuarial Profession warn that the declining death rates would have a knock-on effect on pension schemes—making them more expensive to fund.

2011 was the third consecutive year where deaths in the UK had tallied to below half a million.

The figures provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that the death rate is approximately 20,000 fewer than in previous years.

Ross Matthews, the Head of Mortality Research at Punter Southall actuaries, said: “If the 2011 fall in mortality rates continued, a man of 65 retiring today could expect to live to 91, three years longer than the typical current estimate of 88.”

“A 45-year-old would live to 95, seven years longer. This equates to an increase of up to 15% on pension scheme liabilities, potentially driving deficits by up to 50%”.

However, Gordon Sharp, of the Actuarial Profession, stressed that mortality rates could change from year to year, and warned against reading too much into one year’s improvement in death rates.

“The last 20 years have seen unprecedented improvements in mortality rates, particularly for pensioners,” Mr Sharp said.

“These figures are initial estimates for 2011, and are subject to revision once the ONS publish updated population estimates for the year.

“However, we are able to say with confidence that the mortality improvement for 2011 has been well above the average,” he added.

The ONS has attributed the improved mortality rate to better medical treatment for diseases and illness.  It pointed out that circulatory diseases had benefitted from the largest reduction of recorded deaths, aided by many people giving up smoking and leading healthier lifestyles.

The ONS reported in January that throughout the UK, death rates had decreased and in 2010 were at their lowest-ever numbers.

Mortality rates have fallen sharply for both males and females in the past two decades—by 48% and 39% respectively, with 1,261 recorded deaths per 100,000 in 1980 compared to 655 in 2010.

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Feb 07, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Consumer groups warn payday loan practices unlikely to improve under new regulations

Posted on Thursday, February 2nd, 2012 in News

Recent rule changes to the lending practices of payday loan companies are unlikely to give better protection to borrowers.

The Finance and Leasing Association (FLA), announced it had updated the code of practise for payday loan firms.  Following pressure from consumer groups and the Government the FLA have introduced a new rule that states that a payday loan can only be rolled over 3 times.

However, consumer groups warn this won’t protect lenders and that firmer action needs to be taken to stop customers from running up huge debts.

The rules set by the FLA cover short-term loans, also known as payday loans.  These offer customers small amounts of money to be repaid over a short period of time.  However, charges soon stack up if the borrower is unable to repay the loan in the agreed time. Rolling the loan over results in the customer paying huge interest rates of more than 4000%.

Stella Creasy, Labour MP for Walthamstow, has been campaigning for the government to bring in caps on the cost of short-term loans.  She feels that the LFA’s plans do not go far enough and they are just “tinkering around the edges”.

“What we’ve seen in America is that if you limit roll overs people then pay off the loan and take out another loan straightaway,” she says. “A limit on roll overs will only work if you have a limit on taking out a new loan, say 28 days.”

A spokesperson for the debt advice charity the Consumer Credit Counselling Service, expressed her concern saying that it had seen “quite a large number of people” who had be allowed to roll over loans at least three times.  However, she said that it would prefer to see restrictions on lenders rolling loans over at all, rather than reduce the number of times.

Payday loan companies have been criticised by consumer groups and debt management companies for their lending practices, including charging astronomically high interest rates and using debt collectors when customers cannot repay the loans.

The FLA wants its members to make the terms and cost of borrowing clear to customers before they sign up for loans and to ensure they understand that the loan is a short-term loan which can only be rolled over 3 times.

Head of Consumer Finance at FLA, Fiona Hoyle, said: “A maximum of three roll overs is allowed, but only if the customer has asked for this and a proper credit assessment has been carried out each time. The code sets additional standards for responsible lending and a cap on roll overs is an essential part of this.”

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is due to announce its review of the payday loan industry but Ms Creasy fears that lenders are acting now in an attempt to avoid further regulations.

The body which represent a vast majority of payday loan companies, the Consumer Finance Association (CFA), said it was working on an “enhanced code” along with the Department for Business Innovations and Skills.  It hopes to launch this later in the year.

Chief Executive, John Lamidey, stated that introducing a cap on roll overs could lead to customers simply going elsewhere for credit and ending up in more debt.

“It may well be that we will bow to political or activists pressure and come up with a number [to limit roll overs], but I’m not sure we will do so in the best interests of consumers,” he said.

He added: “The FLA’s code, while very comprehensive, only regulates one payday lender. The CFA represents a number of the largest short-term lenders in the UK, so our code will reach significantly more consumers.”

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Feb 02, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Proposed public sector pension changes will save taxpayers little

Posted on Tuesday, January 31st, 2012 in News

A report from the economic think tank, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), states that the proposed Government changes for public sector pensions will make ‘little or no difference’ to the long-term cost.

The IFS’ report refers to the latest round of pension negotiations, but does say that the previous decision to change the inflation index link will substantially reduce costs.  

The unions are against the changes, saying that their members will have to work for longer and pay more into their pension funds.

The Government has declared that the latest offer to the unions is the last that they bring to the table. They stressed that the new policy for public sector pensions is fair and will save billions of pounds.

One of the major points of the latest proposal is for the normal pension age for public sector workers to rise in line with the state pension—up to 68 years.

 

The IFS responded by saying that this move would not save as much money as the Government had thought.

“In general, lower earners in the public sector will actually get a more generous pension as a result of the recently announced reforms,” the IFS said.

“That is, they will be able to retire at age 65 with a higher annual pension than they would receive under current arrangements.

“This results from the move from final salary to career average schemes and the particular changes to accrual and indexation rules,” the IFS added.

The IFS used analysis of the latest proposals to the NHS pension scheme to come to its conclusions within the report.  Using the information to conduct estimates of what would happen with public sector pensions.

The IFS said that the structure of public sector pensions had been improved by the latest changes, but the switch from using the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) to the Retail Prices Index (RPI) in 2010 was more significant for costs.

“The reforms to public service pensions implemented by the last Labour government, and this government’s decision to switch from RPI to CPI indexation of pension benefits, will in the long run reduce the generosity and therefore the cost of these schemes to the taxpayer,” said Carl Emmerson, deputy director of the IFS.

“But the consequence of the long-drawn-out negotiations over the latest reform appears to be little or no long-term saving to the taxpayer or reduction in generosity, on average, of pensions for public service workers.”

However, the report’s findings were rejected by the unions.  General Secretary of the TUC, Brendan Barber, said: “If you take the package as a whole there can be no doubt that many public sector workers may have to pay more, work longer and get a pension that will not keep up with the proper measure of the cost of living,” he said.

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Jan 31, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

NS&I cuts rate on Direct Saver account

Posted on Thursday, January 26th, 2012 in News, Savings

The Direct Saver accounts from the Government run National Savings and Investments (NS&I), has cut its interest rates.

On January 25th the annual interest rate was reduced from 1.75% to 1.5%  

The NS&I admitted that the decision had been taken to make the popular savings account less desirable. The Government had set a target to collect £2 billion from savers, but it has surpassed that and raised £4.8 billion so far this financial year.

The Chief Executive of NS&I, Jane Platt, said that the move was necessary to slow down the influx of savers funds, she added that she expected the figure to have gone down to £4.5 billion by the end of the financial year.

She said: “Since November we have seen an increase in customer deposits,”

“This has been driven by a relatively small number of savers depositing large amounts of money, particularly into our Direct Saver account.

“We have also seen a decrease in the number of customers withdrawing their money from products across our range,” she added.

The recent problems with global finance markets have led to an increase of savers seeing the Direct Savers account as a safe haven for their money.  Many customers had moved funds from other accounts into their NS&I account and had not taken out any existing savings it had in the Direct Saver accounts.

In March 2011, the Direct Saver had a total of 19,874 customers who had an average of £85,000 savings.  This amounted to £1.7 billion.  The sum has increased substantially, although NS&I would not state what the precise figure was.

The reduction in interest rate was well received by the Building Societies Associations (BSA).

The body have complained that the NS&I has an unfair advantage over building societies in attracting savers.  This has led to a shortfall of funds that could be used to attract new mortgage customers.

Adrian Coles of the BSA, said: “It has been obvious that NS&I has been exceeding its target and would have to reduce its interest rates,”

“It has unique advantages because it can offer a 100% state-backed guarantee and building societies have been losing funds to NS&I.”

In September 2011, the NS&I closed its index-linked bond account to new customers.  The account, which protected savers against rising inflation, had only been on offer for a few months but in that time half a million new accounts were opened.

The NS&I has also been reducing its portfolio of other accounts.  In November the decision was made to cease selling its Investment accounts and Easy Access accounts.

The Investment account will be opened to new savers again in May but only by postal application.  All existing Easy Access accounts will be shut down entirely this July.

The Government offers run by the NS&I will always prove popular as they are the only savings accounts that are guaranteed not to go bust.

 

This is filed under: News, Savings
Added on Jan 26, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Number of pensioners facing fuel poverty grows

Posted on Tuesday, January 24th, 2012 in News, Over 55s

A study conducted by Age UK has revealed that half of the pensioners it surveyed turn their heating down even when they were cold to save money on their fuel bills.

In a report published today, the charity found that approximately 2 million pensioners were so concerned about their rising energy bills they were going to bed early in an attempt to keep warm rather than put the heating on.  A similar amount had moved into one room so they only needed to heat that room rather than the whole house.    

Age UK’s Mervyn Kohler, said that the report highlighted just how many of the country’s elderly were suffering from fuel pover ty.

“The figures are stark and show that people have been shaken rigid by the enormous rise in prices we saw in the second half of last year, and for individuals living on fairly straitened incomes, that hike in one of the two essential areas – the other being food – has really put the frighteners on our older population.”

A different study last year showed that 25% of households in England and Wales were in fuel poverty after large rises in energy bills and pay freezes. This figure had risen from 20% earlier in the year and proved to be embarrassing for the Government who had pledged to eliminate fuel poverty by 2016.

Age UK’s study was based on an ICM survey of 1,000 people aged 60 and over.  It highlights that many of those affected by fuel poverty are vulnerable elderly people. The findings reveal that 90% of people questioned were worried about their energy bills going up and 43% admitted that they had turned down their heating even when they were cold.

Kohler warned that many elderly people were risking getting ill by turning down their heating over the colder months.

“People who are cutting back on the amount of fuel they are using are jeopardising their health. They are going to end up exacerbating respiratory illnesses; they are going to end up isolating themselves in their own homes, feeling miserable sitting in a cold house without anyone coming round to see them. Because the house is too cold they get depressed.

“In the end they are actually stoking up costs for one or another bit of our National Health Service as a result of starving themselves of fuel.”

The study also shows that many of the elderly have been reducing the amount they spend on food to cover their energy bills, with many feeling they had to choose between heating and eating.

 

This is filed under: News, Over 55s
Added on Jan 24, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

Doctors threaten industrial action over pension reforms

Posted on Thursday, January 19th, 2012 in News

Doctors have threatened to go on strike for the first time in over 30 years after refusing a new pension deal.

The British Medical Association (BMA) represents 130,000 doctors and medical students and says that 60% of its members would support industrial action.  If any strikes went ahead they would wreak havoc in hospitals and clinics all over the UK.  

The BMA rejected the cuts to pension pots despite the fact that many hospitals in the UK are seriously over-budget, to a point where the safety of patients cannot be guaranteed.

A government source said: “It seems a bit rich for doctors to be complaining about cuts and patient care when they leave the NHS as millionaires.”

During the last ten years the consultants have seen their pay increase by an average of 54%, less qualified doctors have received an average increase of 30%.  Doctors’ pay has recently been frozen, but a GP earns an average of £110,000 a year.

Doctors also won the right to opt out of weekend and night on-call duty.

Currently doctors have final-pensions pensions that see an average NHS doctor retiring at 60 receiving a pension of £48,000 a year for life, along with a tax-free sum of £143,000 when they retire.  The same pension scheme in the private sector would be worth more than £1.7 million.

A Department of Health spokesperson said the current situation was “unsustainable”.

“Doctors and consultants who are among the highest earners in the NHS have benefited hugely from the current final salary scheme arrangements compared to other staff groups,”

“The reforms to public service pensions will ensure that NHS pensions remain amongst the very best. The Government has made clear that this is our final position on the main elements of scheme design — it is a fair and affordable deal for both staff and the taxpayer.”

The new proposal will see doctors working past 60 to earn the equivalent pension however, those who have less than 10 years to go before retirement will be unaffected by the changes.

The BMA states that the proposal also means that doctors will have to give up some of their pension in exchange for a lump sum payment when they retire.  It went on to say that its members were feeling ‘betrayed’ by the new pension proposals, which could lead to the first wave of industrial action since 1975.

A country-wide survey of BMA members showed that 80% of doctors rejected the new pension proposals and two thirds backed industrial action.

Whilst only 20% questioned said that they would actually go out on strike, the majority backed other actions such as working-to-rule.

A spokesperson for the BMA added: “The strength and scale of feeling among doctors are abundantly clear. They feel let down and betrayed, and for many this is the final straw.”

Both the Royal College of Nursing and the Royal College of Midwives have joined with the BMA and the Royal College of General Practitioners to oppose the new Government plans to reform the NHS.

 

 

This is filed under: News
Added on Jan 19, 2012 by wendy | Comments 0

AnnuitySupermarket.com is an independent marketing website owned by Annuity Supermarket Limited. Registered Office: 5 Jupiter House, Calleva Park, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 8NN. Registered in England and Wales No: 06513009. Telephone: 0207 183 0360.

Annuity Supermarket Limited cannot and do not offer financial advice. All information you supply to this site will be passed to independent financial advisers who will contact you. Annuity Supermarket Limited is not responsible or liable for any financial service provided by, or obtained through a third party. Our service is free to you but to operate this service we may receive commissions from the independent financial adviser we refer you to. Terms